<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CoderHump - Latest Comments in Tip: Setting Up Flex Builder The Sane Way</title><link>http://coderhump.disqus.com/</link><description>My personal blog.</description><atom:link href="https://coderhump.disqus.com/tip_setting_up_flex_builder_the_sane_way/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:16:50 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tip: Setting Up Flex Builder The Sane Way</title><link>http://coderhump.com/archives/280#comment-5484411</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice writeup, Orion. Linking it in from my post &lt;a href="http://coderhump.com/?p=371" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://coderhump.com/?p=371"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Garney</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:16:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tip: Setting Up Flex Builder The Sane Way</title><link>http://coderhump.com/archives/280#comment-5483830</link><description>&lt;p&gt;for those who may come across this post on their search to learning how to set up a command-line-only Flex environment, and who also know previously zilch about Flex/AS/Flash, i sketch the steps very roughly here: &lt;a href="http://elenzil.com/flash/flash_1" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://elenzil.com/flash/flash_1"&gt;http://elenzil.com/flash/fl...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">elenzil</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:41:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tip: Setting Up Flex Builder The Sane Way</title><link>http://coderhump.com/archives/280#comment-4919204</link><description>&lt;p&gt;heh. interesting; i look forward to the post !&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thanks for this Flex tip, btw.&lt;br&gt;since my comment above i started looking for a framework in which to write some simple 3D apps in a portable, easy-to-consume way and have decided to try out Flash 10. i'm hoping the command-line-only approach will work out, but i'll probably give the IDE a look as well.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">elenzil</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:06:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tip: Setting Up Flex Builder The Sane Way</title><link>http://coderhump.com/archives/280#comment-4419527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good question. In fact, so good that I put it in my queue for future blog posts instead of writing out an answer here. :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Short answer: I like Tamarin best because it has AS3 support. The performance isn't the biggest issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Garney</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:10:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tip: Setting Up Flex Builder The Sane Way</title><link>http://coderhump.com/archives/280#comment-4394176</link><description>&lt;p&gt;hey ben, it's orion elenzil.&lt;br&gt;any thoughts on the new google native x86 stuff vs the recent work in the various javascript cores ?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">elenzil</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:28:09 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>